Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
courses:cs211:winter2011:journals:wendy:chapter3 [2011/02/02 05:49] – shangw | courses:cs211:winter2011:journals:wendy:chapter3 [2011/02/15 07:33] (current) – [Section 5: Directed Acyclic Graphs and Topological Ordering] shangw | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
===== Section 5: Connectivity in Directed Graphs ===== | ===== Section 5: Connectivity in Directed Graphs ===== | ||
+ | To store the information of a directed graphs we normally need two adj. lists: 1st recording "to which nodes" for each node; 2nd recording "from which nodes" for each node. For two nodes in a directed graph to be connected, they have to be mutually reachable. Running the BFS or DFS of a node s on the "to which" list help us build the trees showing all the nodes that are reachable from s, but not from where one can get to s. | ||
+ | |||
+ | For a strong connected graph, every two nodes are connected. Running the BFS twice from both "to which" and "from which" direction , together with theorem 3.16, can easily test if a graph is strongly connected. Further more, similar to undirected graphs, for any two nodes s and t in a directed graph, their strong components are either identical or disjoint. | ||
+ | |||
+ | I thought about how to compute the strong component of directed graph, but not sure if it is right: | ||
+ | 1, find a random node s, run BFS twice from both "to which" and "from which" direction, chose the overlap part, denote as the first strong component. Mark every node in the component. | ||
+ | 2, Find an unmarked graph and do the same thing. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Section 5: Directed Acyclic Graphs and Topological Ordering ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | This section first introduces the definition of DAG. Then a very important application of DAG follows the definition: dependencies, | ||
+ | |||
+ | DAG and topological ordering has important practical applications. At the same time, it is not hard to conceptually understand them well. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The readability of the section is 7. |