Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| courses:cs211:winter2018:journals:cohene:home:chapter4 [2018/03/06 01:27] – [4.5: The Minimum Spanning Problem] cohene | courses:cs211:winter2018:journals:cohene:home:chapter4 [2018/03/12 23:28] (current) – Added Section 4.8 cohene | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| ===== 4.6: Implementing Kruskal' | ===== 4.6: Implementing Kruskal' | ||
| + | The Union-Find data-structure will store a representation of connected components that allows us to quickly and efficiently search and update these components. This turns out to be the same data structure in Kruskal' | ||
| + | To create this structure, we create an array Component, and a set with n elements. To create the union-find, we initialize the Component array to the set. We can optimize this set by choosing the name for the union to be the name of one of the sets. Furthermore, | ||
| + | |||
| + | We can implement Kruskal' | ||
| ===== 4.7: Clustering ===== | ===== 4.7: Clustering ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | This section discusses clustering. Clustering can be used whenever one is attempting to organize a collection into various groups. There are various ways to group a collection. One way is by distance, such as with points on a plane. We can use minimum spanning trees to play a part in clusterings of maximum spacing. If we want to divide objects into k groups, we will have a k-clustering as a partition of a union into k nonempty sets. The spacing of a k-clustering is the minimum distance between any pair of points in different clusters. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | To find a clustering of maximum spacing, we want to cluster points as rapidly as possible. We grow a graph edge by edge, with connected components corresponding to clusters. This process will never create a cycle, but rather a union of trees. This procedure is extremely similar to Kruskal' | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===== 4.8: Huffman Codes and Data Compression ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | This chapter discusses solving problems using data compression. Here, the problem is encoding symbols using bits. To convert various " | ||
| + | |||
| + | One example of how data has been compressed is Morse code. Morse code translates each symbol into dots or dashes. However, Morse code removes ambiguity between letters that are represented similarly by adding a space in between each letter. If we were to turn this into bits, the ambiguity would remain as certain encodings are prefixes to others. A method must be built to eliminate the prefix problem. The method could work as follows: | ||
| + | Start reading bits from left to right, once you come across enough bits to match an encoding this becomes a letter, continue with the next bit and repeat. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Now, we must account for letter frequencies to make the most optimal encoding. We can use a greedy algorithm to find the optimal prefix code. First, we can build a tree to help us build each encoding. We will create a binary tree where each time we go from a node to its left child we add a 0 and every time we go from a node to its right child we add a 1. By using a tree, we can see that the length of each symbol in bits is its corresponding layer in the tree. We want to fill the binary tree to make it optimal. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The first thought of building is tree is to attempt to build it top down. However, if we knew the optimal prefix code, this would help a great amount. We could then simply fill in the nodes of the tree. We would start with the highest frequency letters and move down through the tree, labeling nodes in order of decreasing frequency. This is essentially the basis of Huffman' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Huffman' | ||
| + | |||
