Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
courses:cs211:winter2018:journals:goldm:ch1 [2018/01/17 00:13] goldmcourses:cs211:winter2018:journals:goldm:ch1 [2018/01/17 00:18] (current) goldm
Line 1: Line 1:
-    This section focuses on the algorithm developed by David Gale and Lloyd Shapley in 1962. The algorithm, called the Stable matching problem, is meant to answer the question: "Could one design a college admissions process, or a job recruiting process, that was+This section focuses on the algorithm developed by David Gale and Lloyd Shapley in 1962. The algorithm, called the Stable matching problem, is meant to answer the question: "Could one design a college admissions process, or a job recruiting process, that was
 self-enforcing?" This algorithm can also be illustrated by matching groups of people into "couples" so that they all are matched with the best possible individual to lead to a stable relationship environment. The remainder of the section goes on to discuss implementation and results of the algorithm and related proofs which will be discussed after this summary. self-enforcing?" This algorithm can also be illustrated by matching groups of people into "couples" so that they all are matched with the best possible individual to lead to a stable relationship environment. The remainder of the section goes on to discuss implementation and results of the algorithm and related proofs which will be discussed after this summary.
-    As aforementioned, the motivation for the problem is to develop a college admissions/job recruitment process that self-enforced and avoided people "jumping ship" to other opportunities.+ 
 +As aforementioned, the motivation for the problem is to develop a college admissions/job recruitment process that self-enforced and avoided people "jumping ship" to other opportunities.
     Here is a sketch of the algorithm as given by the text:     Here is a sketch of the algorithm as given by the text:
     Initially all m E M and w E W are free     Initially all m E M and w E W are free
-While there is a man m who is free and hasn’t proposed to +    While there is a man m who is free and hasn’t proposed to 
-every woman+    every woman
      Choose such a man m      Choose such a man m
      Let w be the highest-ranked woman in m’s preference list      Let w be the highest-ranked woman in m’s preference list
Line 15: Line 16:
        m remains free        m remains free
         Else w prefers m to m’         Else w prefers m to m’
-(m,w) become engaged+    (m,w) become engaged
     m' becomes free     m' becomes free
         Endif         Endif
     Endif     Endif
-Endwhile +   Endwhile 
-Return the set S of engaged pairs+  Return the set S of engaged pairs 
 +   
 +The algorithm runs in n squared. 
 + 
 +I found the discussion in class much more enlightening than the reading, and as such, I give this reading a 2/10.
                
courses/cs211/winter2018/journals/goldm/ch1.1516148004.txt.gz · Last modified: by goldm
CC Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International
Driven by DokuWiki Recent changes RSS feed Valid CSS Valid XHTML 1.0